Protecting habitats is very important to the survival of many species, but its not enough. To really thrive, these habitats must be connected to one another by wildlife corridors.

Combination of a warm winter & increased natural gas production is making natural gas the fuel of choice.

A team of U.S. researchers that has been examining the impacts of radiation exposure on flora and fauna in Chernobyl will be conducting a similar long-term study in Japan.

A neat and complete list of the not-to-be-missed green fashion shows. Plus, exclusive pre-New York Fashion Week interviews with designers like Costello Tagliapietra and Crop by David Peck.

Amir planted a garden in the hills of LA's largest park 40 years ago and few people still know about it

Residents of Alaska and neighboring British Columbia have known for years that the cedars are dying. Now scientists know why.

Belly Armor claims to protect pregnant women against non-ionizing radiation.

A map produced by Columbia University’s School of Engineering and Applied Science provides the energy use of each NYC block, broken down by purpose and quantity.

T-Rex to consume recyclables at Coachella. Prize offered for best use of the dino droppings. Really.

Create post

The House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure dealt a damaging blow to successful bike and pedestrian programs across the country on Thursday. 

Despite statistics that show such programs are helping to make cities safer, less congested, and more pedestrian-friendly, the Committee voted against the Petri-Johnson-Lipinski amendment which would have extended funding for Safe Routes to Schools and Transportation Enhancements. The amendment lost by a narrow 29 -27 vote.

Those who voted against the amendment said it's for local communities to decide if they want to set federal transportation dollars aside to make biking and walking safer.

But those who supported the amendment say safe bike pathways, greenways, and pedestrian areas are crucial to the health and vitality of local communities, as well as reducing the number of cars on the road, which brings down air pollution levels. 

These claims are reinforced by a three-part series to be published by the Safe Routes to Schools program in the next few months, which found:

• SRTS programs and strategies can play a significant role in reducing vehicle traffic near schools, encouraging more parents to allow their children to bike or walk to class,

• SRTS helps change driver behaviors that improve safety for pedestrians and bicyclists, and

• SRTS has increased student participation in walking and bicycling, vital physical exercise in a time of rampant childhood obesity.

If you're confused and frustrated by this decision to defund programs that have a positive impact on communities, you're not alone. Check out Rep. Peter DeFazio's (Oregon) powerful defense of SRTS:

The silver lining of this particularly ominous cloud is that the Transportation Bill now heads to the U.S. Senate, where biking and walking advocates will have one last chance to restore the amendment and SRTS funding.

"You will soon be hearing more about our efforts to push a Senate amendment to improve the Senate’s provisions on Safe Routes to School, bicycling and walking," reads a statement on SaferRoutesPartnership.org. "Please stand together with us to act again when we call you to action soon for the Senate floor vote."

Editor Control Global channel:  Publishers channel Bookmark/Search this post with: